logo
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • License Agreement
    • Charges and Financing
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Contacts
  • en
    • Українська

Ecological Safety and Balanced Use of Resources

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

Modelling infiltration processes in rain gardens: Influence of design parameters on hydrological efficiency

Maryna Kravchenko, Tetiana Tkachenko, Viktor Mileikovskyi
Abstract

A rain garden is a stormwater management system designed for on-site water control. Suboptimal rain garden designs may compromise hydrological performance during operation, necessitating developing and validating a mathematical model for engineering calculations and design assessment. This study aimed to model infiltration processes in a rain garden using a mathematical framework that accounts for the height of the water column (HWC) on the surface and the filtration coefficient of soil materials, simulating system behaviour during an extreme rainfall event (36 mm/h). The developed model generated performance curves illustrating the rain garden’s efficiency as a function of design parameters: construction depth, catchment-to-garden area ratio, filtration coefficient, and water retention capacity (WRC). Key soil material parameters were determined experimentally under laboratory conditions. The infiltration performance of the system was evaluated by analysing the variation in infiltration time, saturation of all layers, and the water filling level of the rain garden resulting from adjustments to its parameters and changes in HWC on the surface. The modelling results indicated that the primary parameters influencing the predicted time for complete system saturation and HWC formation are the catchment-to-garden area ratio and the filtration coefficient. The WRC of soil materials and the depth of the system layers significantly impact the time required for full saturation and water filling but have minimal effect on the surface HWC. It was demonstrated that a rain garden with a depth of 1.2 m, a catchment-to-garden area ratio of 15, and a filtration coefficient of 100-200 cm/h functions effectively under critical rainfall intensities. The developed model and the resulting data, providing precise calculations and design recommendations, can be utilised by engineers and planners to optimise rain garden designs, thereby enhancing stormwater management efficiency

Download article

Received 04.07.2024

Revised 30.09.2024

Accepted 02.12.2024

https://doi.org/10.69628/esbur/2.2024.22
Retrieved from Vol. 15, No. 2, 2024
Pages 22-35

Suggested citation

Kravchenko, M., Tkachenko, T., & Mileikovskyi, V. (2024). Modelling infiltration processes in rain gardens: Influence of design parameters on hydrological efficiency. Ecological Safety and Balanced Use of Resources, 15(2), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.69628/esbur/2.2024.22

References

[1] Abdallah, A.M., Jat, H.S., Choudhary, M., Abdelaty, E.F., Sharma, P.C., & Jat, M.L. (2021). Conservation agriculture effects on soil water holding capacity and water-saving varied with management practices and agroecological conditions: A review. Agronomy, 11(9), article number 1681. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11091681.

[2] Adoption guidelines for stormwater biofiltration systems: Cities as water supply catchments – sustainable technologies. (2015). Retrieved from https://watersensitivecities.org.au/content/stormwater-biofilter-design/.

[3] Alamdari, N., & Sample, D.J. (2019). A multiobjective simulation-optimization tool for assisting in urban watershed restoration planning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 251-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.108.

[4] Bethke, G.M., William, R., & Stillwell, A.S. (2022). Rain garden performance as a function of native soil parameters. Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment, 8(1), article number 04021021. doi: 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000967.

[5] Bioretention – rain garden – recommendations. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://greatriversgreenway.org/design-guidelines/environmental/bioretention-raingarden/.

[6] Bortolini, L., & Zanin, G. (2019). Reprint of: Hydrological behaviour of rain gardens and plant suitability: A study in the Veneto plain (north-eastern Italy) conditions. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 37, 74-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.003.

[7] Burszta-Adamiak, E., Biniak-Pieróg, M., Dąbek, P.B., & Sternik, A. (2023). Rain garden hydrological performance – responses to real rainfall events. Science of The Total Environment, 887, article number 164153. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164153.

[8] DSTU B V.2.1-23:2009. (2009). Bases and foundations of buildings and structures. Soils. Methods of laboratory determination of the filtration coefficient. Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=25933.

[9] Goh, H.W., Lem, K.S., Azizan, N.A., Chang, C.K., Talei, A., Leow, C.S., & Zakaria, N.A. (2019). A review of bioretention components and nutrient removal under different climates – future directions for tropics. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 14904-14919. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05041-0.

[10] Hallam, J., & Hodson, M.E. (2020). Impact of different earthworm ecotypes on water stable aggregates and soil water holding capacity. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 56, 607-617. doi: 10.1007/s00374-020-01432-5.

[11] Hoban, A., & Gambirazio, C. (2021). Bioretention performance: A review of field studies. Australasian Journal of Water Resources, 25(2), 202-210. doi: 10.1080/13241583.2021.1984190.

[12] Jiang, C., Li, J., Li, H., & Li, Y. (2019). An improved approach to design bioretention system media. Ecological Engineering, 136, 125-133. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.06.014.

[13] Kim, J., Baek, J., Kim, B., & Kwon, S. (2023). Analysis of outflow reduction effect of bioretention in small watersheds during short-term rainfall. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, 56(12), 855-869. doi: 10.3741/JKWRA.2023.56.12.855.

[14] Kravchenko, M., Trach, Y., Trach, R., Tkachenko, T., & Mileikovskyi, V. (2024a). Improving the efficiency and environmental friendliness of urban stormwater management by enhancing the water filtration model in rain gardens. Water, 16(10), article number 1316. doi: 10.3390/w16101316.

[15] Kravchenko, M., Trach, Y., Trach, R., Tkachenko, T., & Mileikovskyi, V. (2024b). Behaviour and peculiarities of oil hydrocarbon removal from rain garden structures. Water, 16(13), article number 1802. doi: 10.3390/w16131802.

[16] Kravchenko, М., Tkachenko, T., & Mileikovskyi, V. (2024c). Study of the influence of the main parameters of the rain garden on its hydrological parameters by modeling. Collection of Scientific Papers of Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding, 1, 166-176. doi: 10.15589/znp2024.1(494).23.

[17] Lee, J., Bae, S., Lee, W.H., & Gil, K. (2022). Effect of surface area to catchment area ratio on pollutant removal efficiency in vegetation-type facilities. Ecological Engineering, 179, article number 106609. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106609.

[18] Li, G., Xiong, J., Zhu, J., Liu, Y., & Dzakpasu, M. (2021). Design influence and evaluation model of bioretention in rainwater treatment: A review. Science of The Total Environment, 787, article number 147592. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147592.

[19] Libohova, Z., Seybold, C., Wysocki, D., Wills, S., Schoeneberger, P., Williams, C., Lindbo, D., Stott, D., & Owens, P.R. (2018). Reevaluating the effects of soil organic matter and other properties on available water-holding capacity using the national cooperative soil survey characterization database. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 73(4), 411-421. doi: 10.2489/jswc.73.4.411.

[20] Lisenbee, W., Hathaway, J., Negm, L., Youssef, M., & Winston, R. (2020). Enhanced bioretention cell modeling with DRAINMOD-Urban: Moving from water balances to hydrograph production. Journal of Hydrology, 582, article number 124491. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124491.

[21] Lisenbee, W.A., Hathaway, J.M., & Winston, R.J. (2022). Modeling bioretention hydrology: Quantifying the performance of DRAINMOD-Urban and the SWMM LID module. Journal of Hydrology, 612, article number 128179. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128179.

[22] Liu, R., & Fassman-Beck, E. (2018). Pore structure and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of engineered media for living roofs and bioretention based on water retention data. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 23(3), article number 04017065. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001621.

[23] Nelson, J.T., Adjuik, T.A., Moore, E.B., VanLoocke, A.D., Ramirez Reyes, A., & McDaniel, M.D. (2024). A simple, affordable, do-it-yourself method for measuring soil maximum water holding capacity. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 55(8), 1190-1204. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2023.2296988.

[24] Nichols, W., Welker, A., Traver, R., & Tu, M.-C. (2021). “Peter” modeling seasonal performance of operational urban rain garden using HYDRUS-1D. Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment, 7(3), article number 04021005. doi: 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000941.

[25] Nuruddin, M., & Moghal, A.A.B. (2024). State-of-the-art review on the geotechnical and geoenvironmental feasibility of select biochars. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 54, 1073-1094. doi: 10.1007/s40098-023-00788-3.

[26] Putri, F.K., Hidayah, E., & Ma’ruf, M.F. (2023). Enhancing stormwater management with low impact development (LID): A review of the rain barrel, bioretention, and permeable pavement applicability in Indonesia. Water Science & Technology, 87(9), 2345-2361. doi: 10.2166/wst.2023.095.

[27] Rain gardens. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.instagram.com/p/CngYDIatE1B/?img_index=1.

[28] Rain garden and bioretention literature review: An assessment of functional parameters, BMPs and landowner perspectives. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.ezview.wa.gov/Portals/_1962/Documents/SAM/RainGarden-Bioretention%20Literature%20Review%202017.pdf.

[29] Rinchumphu, D., Suriyanon, N., Phichetkunbodee, N., Munlikawong, S., Wanitchayapaisit, C., & Sitthikankun, S. (2023). Economics and cost effectiveness of a rain garden for flood-resistant urban design. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 10(1), 1-12. doi: 10.22034/gjesm.2024.01.01.

[30] Sittisom, P., Tangsongsuwan, R., Munlikawong, S., Wongsapai, W., Sitthikankun, S., & Rinchumphu, D. (2022). The determination of soil infiltration rate of urban bioretention design process in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 21(3), article number 228. doi: 10.54028/NJ202221228.

[31] Ellis, L., & Bettin, K. (2022). Stormwater management: Rain gardens to bioretention areas. Journal of Opinions, Ideas & Essays, 5, article number 1.

[32] Takaijudin, H., Abdurrashed, A.S., Osman, M., Sholagberu, A.T., Yusof, W.K., & Ab Ghani, A. (2019). The influence of soil characteristics on hydraulic performance in bioretention system. Platform: A Journal of Science and Technology, 2(1), 12-22. doi: 10.61762/pjstvol2iss1art4587.

[33] Técher, D., & Berthier, E. (2023). Supporting evidences for vegetation-enhanced stormwater infiltration in bioretention systems: A comprehensive review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 19705-19724. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25333-w.

[34] Verheijen, F.G.A., Zhuravel, A., Silva, F.C., Amaro, A., Ben-Hur, M., & Keizer, J.J. (2019). The influence of biochar particle size and concentration on bulk density and maximum water holding capacity of sandy vs sandy loam soil in a column experiment. Geoderma, 347, 194-202. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.03.044.

[35] Wang, J., Chua, L.H.C., & Shanahan, P. (2019). Hydrological modeling and field validation of a bioretention basin. Journal of Environmental Management, 240, 149-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.090.

[36] Williams, A., Jordan, N.R., Smith, R.G., Hunter, M.C., Kammerer, M., Kane, D.A., Koide, R.T., & Davis, A.S. (2018). A regionally-adapted implementation of conservation agriculture delivers rapid improvements to soil properties associated with crop yield stability. Scientific Reports, 8, article number 8467. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26896-2.

[37] Zhang, B., Li, J., & Li, Y. (2020). Simulation and optimization of rain gardens via DRAINMOD model and response surface methodology. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 20(3), 413-423. doi: 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2020.03.002.

[38] Zhang, L., Ye, Z., & Shibata, S. (2020). Assessment of rain garden effects for the management of urban storm runoff in Japan. Sustainability, 12(23), article number 9982. doi: 10.3390/su12239982.

Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas 76019, 15 Karpatska Str., Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

  • mail@esbur.com.ua