logo
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • License Agreement
    • Charges and Financing
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Contacts
  • en
    • Українська

Ecological Safety and Balanced Use of Resources

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

Philosophical and methodological bases of overcoming the global environmental crisis or the foundations of eschatological methodology

Oleg Mandryk, Mariana Stakh, Volodymyr Sabadukha
Abstract

Philosophical and methodological principles of solving the global environmental crisis are considered in the article. The need to unite the efforts of ecologists and philosophers to overcome it was proved. The philosophical causes of the global crisis were found to be the materialistic world outlook orientation and the spiritual imperfection of man which creates destructive phenomena in the life of man, society and in the relationship between man and nature. Taking into account the destructive nature of human activity, a more accurate name for the global ecological crisis was proposed – the “anthropological-global catastrophe”. Overcoming the catastrophic trends requires improving the moral qualities of a person and changing the determination of their life activities. The authors have formulated the main provisions of the eschatological methodology, which consists of three components: the spiritual improvement of a person, the development of a personal society and the harmonization of relations between man and nature. The authors proposed using the metaphysical theory of a personality as the basis of human activity, society and human relations with nature. This made it possible to explain the causes of the anthropological-global catastrophe both at the level of human and social existence as well as human relations with nature. The future of the human community is possible only in case of the fundamental reduction of human destructiveness. It has been proved that teleological determination plays an important role in overcoming catastrophic trends. In the conditions of globalization, the humanity must realize themselves as a transcendental subject of the activity, impose a taboo on the growth of material production and consider it a kind of a spiritual one and introduce determination of the future

Download article

Received 17.01.2023

Revised 12.04.2023

Accepted 07.06.2023

https://doi.org/10.31471/2415-3184-2023-1(27)-132-142
Retrieved from Vol. 14, No. 1, 2023
Pages 132-142

Suggested citation

Mandryk, O., Stakh, M., & Sabadukha, V. (2023). Philosophical and methodological bases of overcoming the global environmental crisis or the foundations of eschatological methodology. Ecological Safety and Balanced Use of Resources, 14(1), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.31471/2415-3184-2023-1(27)-132-142

References

[1] Adamenko, O. (2014). Constructive ecology. Saarbrecken: LARLAMBERT Academic Publishing.

[2] Devall, B., & Sessions, G. (1985). Deep ecology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

[3] Holubets, M. (2000). Ecosystemology. Lviv: Polly.

[4] Apel, K.-O. (1999). Ecological crisis as a challenge to discursive ethics. Retrieved from https://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Apel_Karl-Otto/Ekolohichna_kryza_yak_vyklyk_dyskursyvnii_etytsi.pdf?.

[5] Yermolenko, A. (2010). Social ethics and ecology. Human dignity is respect for nature. Kyiv: Libra.

[6] Meyer-Abich, K.M. (2004). Revolution for nature: From the environment to the connatural world. Winwick: White Horse Press.

[7] Depenchuk, N., Krysachenko, V. (1987). Ecology and theory of evolution (methodological aspect). Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.

[8] Horban, R. (2014). The eschatological perspective of history in the interpretation of Mykola Berdiaev. Ivano-Frankivsk: Nova Zoria.

[9] Vernadsky, V. (1977). Reflections of a naturalist. Scientific thought as a planetary phenomenon. Moscow: Nauka.

[10] Mandryk, O., Maliovanyi, M., & Orfanova, M. (2019). Environmental education for sustainable development. Ecological Safety and Balanced Use of Resources, 10(1), 130-139. doi: 10.31471/2415-3184-2019-1(19)-130-139.

[11] Fromm, E. (1976). To have or to be? New York: Harper & Row.

[12] Zolotoustyi, Yo. (2007). Collection of teachings (Vol. 1). Lviv: Missioner.

[13] Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Retrieved from https://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/kant1785.pdf.

[14] Sabadukha, V. (2019). Metaphysics of social and personal existence. Ivano-Frankivsk: Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas.

[15] Hrechanyi, O., & Sabadukha, V. (2015). The philosophy of abilities in the context of the priority of the spiritual over the material. Luhansk: Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University Publishing House.

[16] Sabadukha, V. (2011). Sins of the average person, or a philosophical analysis of the causes of human destructiveness. Practical Philosophy, 1(39), 31-41.

[17] Hrabovskyi, S. (2010). Climate catastrophe: Mythology or inevitability? Modernity, 4, 114-128.

[18] Goesle, V. (2003). Practical philosophy in the modern world. Kyiv: Libra.

[19] Zarubytskyi, K. (2000). The fate of civilization in the light of the philosophy of Martin Heidegger. Philosophical Thought, 2, 95-109.

[20] Maleev, K. (n.d.). The otherworldly, which really exists. Unmythical afterlife. Kyiv: Stylus.

Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas 76019, 15 Karpatska Str., Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

  • mail@esbur.com.ua